This November, Arkansas voters will decide whether to increase the state’s minimum wage to $11 by 2021. Someone currently working full-time for minimum wage in the state earns only $340 per week.[1] If Issue 5 passes, approximately 300,000 workers across the state will see their incomes rise. That represents nearly 1 out of 4 workers in Arkansas. This fact sheet presents the first county-by-county analysis of who will benefit from increasing Arkansas’ minimum wage to $11 by 2021. Across all 75 of Arkansas’ counties, regardless of population size and density, approximately 300,000 workers will benefit from a minimum wage increase.
If Issue 5 succeeds, Arkansas will join the more than 20 states that have raised their minimum wage since 2012. The appendix includes a chart estimating how many workers in each Arkansas county will benefit.
Workers in Every Single Arkansas County—Nearly 1 in 4 Working Arkansans in Total—Would Benefit From an $11 Minimum Wage
A higher minimum wage would allow workers across Arkansas to cope with the rising cost of basic necessities, such as housing, food, transportation, and healthcare. Even in Arkansas’ smallest county, Calhoun County,[2] a single adult needs to make $33,403 per year to afford a modest standard of living, [3] though the yearly income for a full-time worker (40 hours a week) at the current $8.50 minimum wage[4] is only $17,680. See the Appendix for a complete list of counties and estimated number of workers affected.
As Table 1 shows, workers who would benefit from Issue 5 represent nearly a quarter of all working Arkansans. By 2021, each worker directly affected will earn an average of $1,040 more annually and wages will increase by an estimated average of $1,520 when taking into account both directly and indirectly affected workers.[5] The additional income would not only help working families throughout the state, it would also benefit small businesses and Arkansas’ broader economy. Research shows that higher wages lead to increased spending, which, in turn, has the effect of boosting the demand for goods and services[6] and keeping money circulating in the economy—creating a virtuous cycle that benefits a broad constituency.[7]
Table 1. Arkansas Counties That Would Benefit From a Higher Minimum Wage | |||
Number of counties | Number of Workers | Average Pay Increase Per Employee (Directly and Indirectly Affected) | |
All Arkansas counties that would benefit | 75 | 300,000 | $1,520 |
Share of total | 100% | 24.8% | |
Source: NELP analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ 2016 Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, the Census Bureau’s 2016 Current Population Survey Outgoing Rotation Groups (CPS ORG) and the CBO’s Economic Projections (June 2017). |
In 26 Counties, Issue 5 Will Raise Wages for More than 30 Percent of Workers, Largely in Arkansas’ Small Towns and Rural Areas
A NELP analysis shows that if voters approve the initiative, 300,000 workers, living in each of Arkansas’ 75 counties will see the benefits of a higher wage. Examining data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Arkansas Advocates for Children & Families, this analysis also found that Issue 5 would increase wages for at least 30 percent of each county’s workers in 26 counties.[8] All of these counties lie outside of Little Rock, Fort Smith, and Fayetteville. See Table 2 for a breakdown of Arkansas counties where at least 30 percent of workers will see their wages increase through Issue 5.
Table 2. Counties in Arkansas Where at Least 30 Percent of Workers Will See a Wage Increase Through Issue 5 | |||
County | Percentage of area workers impacted |
County |
Percentage of area workers impacted |
Newton County | 37.8% | Polk County | 32.0% |
Searcy County | 36.4% | Yell County | 31.8% |
Montgomery County | 35.7% | Dallas County | 31.7% |
Stone County | 34.6% | Cleveland County | 31.2% |
Fulton County | 33.8% | Chicot County | 31.2% |
Carroll County | 33.5% | Logan County | 31.1% |
Scott County | 33.5% | Phillips County | 30.7% |
Marion County | 33.3% | Cleburne County | 30.6% |
Clay County | 33.2% | Johnson County | 30.4% |
Sharp County | 33.0% | Lawrence County | 30.4% |
Pike County | 32.7% | Howard County | 30.4% |
Monroe County | 32.6% | Sevier County | 30.4% |
Randolph County | 32.1% | Izard County | 30.2% |
Source: NELP analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ 2016 Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), the
Arkansas Advocates for Families and Children and the Current Population Survey. For more details on methodology, see Endnote 8. |
A Growing Number of Jurisdictions Are Enacting Minimum Wage Increases, Reflecting Continued Concerns With Low Wages and Support for Bold Change
With job growth skewed towards low-paying occupations over the past decade, there has been growing national momentum for action to raise the minimum wage. Although the U.S. median household income is slowly climbing from the depths of the Great Recession,[9] hourly wages continue to stay flat or decline for most of the labor force, even amidst the economic recovery and a full employment economy. The worsening prospects and opportunities for low-wage workers have prompted a growing number of cities, counties, and states to enact higher minimum wage rates for their residents, often with overwhelming support from voters.[10]
More than 25 years of extensive economic research overwhelmingly concludes that states can increase their minimum wage without reducing employment. Sophisticated recent research and the actual experiences of U.S. states and cities show that increases are manageable for employers and have extensive benefits in increased productivity, lower turnover, and even higher earnings.[11]
The trend in localities and states pushing for higher minimum wage rates is likely to continue as wages decline or stagnate, inequality worsens or remains high, and Congress fails to take bold action to ensure that hard-working individuals can make ends meet.
Conclusion
Raising the minimum wage is one of main tools that states and cities across the country are using to help working families overcome decades of stagnating wages and the rising cost of basic necessities. There is no part of Arkansas where workers and families can afford the basics, save, and achieve some economic security under the state’s current $8.50 minimum wage. Issue 5 would bring a much-needed wage increase to nearly 1 in 4 workers in Arkansas, directly affecting every county in the state.
Appendix 1: Workers in every Arkansas county would benefit from a $11 minimum wage by 2021 | |||||||||||
State/County | Total affected | Total workforce | As % of total workforce | County | Total affected | Total workforce | As % of total workforce | ||||
Arkansas | 300,272 | 1,160,225 | 24.8% | Drew County | 1,904 | 6,684 | 28.5% | ||||
Arkansas County | 2,566 | 10,321 | 24.9% | Faulkner County | 10,618 | 41,988 | 25.3% | ||||
Ashley County | 1,653 | 6,922 | 23.9% | Franklin County | 1,278 | 4,662 | 27.4% | ||||
Baxter County | 4,394 | 15,228 | 28.9% | Fulton County | 644 | 1,904 | 33.8% | ||||
Benton County | 23,272 | 119,556 | 19.5% | Garland County | 10,550 | 37,918 | 27.8% | ||||
Boone County | 3,913 | 14,514 | 27% | Grant County | 1,079 | 4,134 | 26.1% | ||||
Bradley County | 1,145 | 3,849 | 29.8% | Greene County | 4,339 | 16,012 | 27.1% | ||||
Calhoun County | 585 | 2,873 | 20.4% | Hempstead County | 2,320 | 8,157 | 28.4% | ||||
Carroll County | 3,770 | 11,266 | 33.5% | Hot Spring County | 2,473 | 8,841 | 28.0% | ||||
Chicot County | 1,055 | 3,376 | 31.2% | Howard County | 2,209 | 7,275 | 30.4% | ||||
Clark County | 2,726 | 9,490 | 28.7% | Independence County | 4,362 | 16,057 | 27.2% | ||||
Clay County | 1,156 | 3,478 | 33.2% | Izard County | 986 | 3,269 | 30.2% | ||||
Cleburne County | 2,086 | 6,828 | 30.6% | Jackson County | 1,528 | 5,544 | 27.6% | ||||
Cleveland County | 314 | 1,004 | 31.2% | Jefferson County | 7,387 | 29,446 | 25.1% | ||||
Columbia County | 2,154 | 8,412 | 25.6% | Johnson County | 2,734 | 8,992 | 30.4% | ||||
Conway County | 1,862 | 6,916 | 26.9% | Lafayette County | 368 | 1,260 | 29.2% | ||||
Craighead County | 13,249 | 50,702 | 26.1% | Lawrence County | 1,278 | 4,204 | 30.4% | ||||
Crawford County | 5,700 | 20,293 | 28.1% | Lee County | 614 | 2,054 | 29.9% | ||||
Crittenden County | 4,718 | 17,210 | 27.4% | Lincoln County | 887 | 2,984 | 29.7% | ||||
Cross County | 1,535 | 5,204 | 29.5% | Little River County | 742 | 3,622 | 20.5% | ||||
Dallas County | 937 | 2,959 | 31.7% | Logan County | 1,796 | 5,775 | 31.1% | ||||
Desha County | 1,385 | 4,773 | 29.0% | Lonoke County | 4,209 | 14,632 | 28.8% | ||||
State/County | Total affected | Total workforce | Percentage of total workforce | County | Total affected | Total workforce | Percentage of total workforce | ||||
Madison County | 965 | 3,307 | 29.2% | Scott County | 1,071 | 3,199 | 33.5% | ||||
Marion County | 1,324 | 3,977 | 33.3% | Searcy County | 592 | 1,625 | 36.4% | ||||
Miller County | 3,463 | 13,506 | 25.6% | Sebastian County | 16,781 | 69,177 | 24.3% | ||||
Mississippi County | 4,345 | 18,755 | 23.2% | Sevier County | 1,549 | 5,103 | 30.4% | ||||
Monroe County | 729 | 2,231 | 32.6% | Sharp County | 1,322 | 4,007 | 33.0% | ||||
Montgomery County | 514 | 1,441 | 35.7% | St. Francis County | 2,340 | 8,273 | 28.3% | ||||
Nevada County | 698 | 2,567 | 27.2% | Stone County | 921 | 2,661 | 34.6% | ||||
Newton County | 436 | 1,153 | 37.8% | Union County | 4,074 | 18,533 | 22.0% | ||||
Ouachita County | 2,167 | 7,380 | 29.4% | Van Buren County | 1,025 | 3,728 | 27.5% | ||||
Perry County | 382 | 1,278 | 29.8% | Washington County | 24,308 | 107,503 | 22.6% | ||||
Phillips County | 1,752 | 5,698 | 30.7% | White County | 6,817 | 25,026 | 27.2% | ||||
Pike County | 845 | 2,583 | 32.7% | Woodruff County | 533 | 1,854 | 28.8% | ||||
Poinsett County | 1,509 | 5,454 | 27.7% | Yell County | 2,133 | 6,715 | 31.8% | ||||
Polk County | 1,949 | 6,084 | 32.0% |
|
|||||||
Pope County | 6,872 | 27,268 | 25.2% | ||||||||
Prairie County | 462 | 1,547 | 29.8% | ||||||||
Pulaski County | 55,387 | 258,092 | 21.5% | ||||||||
Randolph County | 1,633 | 5,079 | 32.1% | ||||||||
Saline County | 6,891 | 24,498 | 28.1% | ||||||||
Source: NELP analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ 2016 Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, and the Census Bureau’s 2016 Current Population Survey Outgoing Rotation Groups (CPS ORG). | |||||||||||
[1]. Based on a 40-hour workweek at the current Arkansas minimum wage of $8.50 per hour. Arkansas Department of Labor, Minimum Wage and Overtime, https://www.labor.arkansas.gov/minimum-wage-and-overtime (last viewed Oct. 11, 2018).
[2]. Calhoun County has the smallest population by county in Arkansas. See U.S. Census, QuickFacts, Calhoun County, Arkansas, https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/calhouncountyarkansas (last viewed Oct. 11, 2018).
[3]. Economic Policy Institute, “Family Budget Calculator,” https://www.epi.org/resources/budget/ (last visited Oct. 11, 2018).
[4]. Arkansas Department of Labor, Minimum Wage and Overtime, https://www.labor.arkansas.gov/minimum-wage-and-overtime (last viewed Oct. 11, 2018).
[5]. Arkansas Advocates for Children & Families, An Arkansas Minimum Wage Increase: How It Works And How It Would Benefit Arkansans And The State (Sept. 2018) at 6, http://www.aradvocates.org/wp-content/uploads/AACF.miniwage.webfinal.rev_.9.17.18.pdf.
[6]. See, e.g., Patrick Reimherr, U.S. Department of Labor: Blog, “Higher Wages, a Stronger Bottom Line and Job Growth,” (Aug. 1, 2014), https://blog.dol.gov/2014/08/01/higher-wages-a-stronger-bottom-line-and-job-growth.
[7]. See, e.g., International Labour Organization, Can Minimum Wages Help Rebalance the Economy? (Aug. 12, 2013), http://www.ilo.org/newyork/voices-at-work/WCMS_219658/index.htm.
[8]. NELP analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ 2016 Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), the Arkansas Advocates for Family and Children, e and the Current Population Survey. Estimates are not reported for any counties in which private sector wage data are unavailable in the QCEW. Statewide figure provided by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI). State and county estimates of affected workers include both directly and indirectly affected workers. Indirectly affected workers have a wage rate just above the new minimum wage (between the new minimum wage and the new minimum wage plus the dollar amount of the increase in the previous year’s minimum wage). They will receive a raise as employer pay scales are adjusted upward to reflect the new minimum wage. Indirectly affected workers include workers projected to make less than $11.00 per hour in 2021. For this analysis, we assume that nominal wage growth will total 2.5 percent in each year. The projected share and number of affected workers in each county is based on the QCEW reported mean weekly wage and an assumed 74 percent ratio between the standard deviation and the reported mean. Projections of hourly wages based on work hours for workers in the lowest wage quintile as estimated by EPI in https://www.epi.org/publication/trends-in-work-hours-and-labor-market-disconnection/.
[10]. See, e.g., National Employment Law Project, Fight for $15: Four Years, $62 Billion (Dec. 2016), https://www.nelp.org/wp-content/uploads/Fight-for-15-Four-Years-62-Billion-in-Raises.pdf; National Employment Law Project, New Poll Shows Overwhelming Support for Major Minimum Wage Increase (Jan. 15, 2015), https://www.nelp.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/PR-Federal-Minimum-Wage-Poll-Jan-2015.pdf; National Employment Law Project, Minimum Wage a Big Winner on Election Day (Nov. 2016), https://www.nelp.org/wp-content/uploads/Minimum-Wage-Wins-2016-Elections.pdf.
[11] Arindrajit Dube et al., “Minimum Wage Effects across State Borders: Estimates Using Contiguous Counties” The Review of Economics and Statistics (Nov. 2010), 92(4): 945–64. See also Doruk Cengiz et al., “The Effect of Minimum Wages on the Total Number of Jobs: Evidence from the United States Using a Bunching Estimator,” Society of Labor Economists (Apr. 2017), http://www.sole-jole.org/17722.pdf. (Updated Dec. 2017 version can be accessed from the American Economic Association, https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2018/preliminary/1530). Sylvia Allegretto et al., Center on Wage and Employment Dynamics, The New Wave of Local Minimum Wage Policies: Evidence from Six Cities (Sept. 6, 2018), http://irle.berkeley.edu/the-new-wave-of-local-minimum-wage-policies-evidence-from-six-cities/.
© 2018 National Employment Law Project. This report is covered by the Creative Commons “Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs” license fee (see http://creativecommons.org/licenses). For further inquiries, please contact NELP (nelp@nelp.org).